Warning: The magic method Newspaper_X_Related_Posts::__wakeup() must have public visibility in /customers/0/9/1/designforwellbeing.org/httpd.www/wp-content/themes/newspaper-x/inc/libraries/class-newspaper-x-related-posts.php on line 68

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/0/9/1/designforwellbeing.org/httpd.www/wp-content/themes/newspaper-x/inc/libraries/class-newspaper-x-related-posts.php:68) in /customers/0/9/1/designforwellbeing.org/httpd.www/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>evaluation &#8211; Design for Wellbeing</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=evaluation" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.designforwellbeing.org</link>
	<description>Innovation meets people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2019 09:21:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Evaluating Health Information Systems Using Ontologies</title>
		<link>https://www.productdevelopment.se/?p=2917#new_tab&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=evaluating-health-information-systems-using-ontologies</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Larsson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applied health technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomedical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ehealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fi-star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fistar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health information systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shahryar Eivazzadeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobias larsson]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforwellbeing.org/?p=887</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ABSTRACT Background:&#160;There are several frameworks that attempt to address the challenges of evaluation of health information systems by offering models, methods, and guidelines about what to evaluate, how to evaluate, and how to report the evaluation results. Model-based evaluation frameworks usually suggest universally applicable evaluation aspects but do not consider case-specific aspects. On the other [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">ABSTRACT</h3>



<p><strong>Background:&nbsp;</strong>There are several frameworks that attempt to address the challenges of evaluation of health information systems by offering models, methods, and guidelines about what to evaluate, how to evaluate, and how to report the evaluation results. Model-based evaluation frameworks usually suggest universally applicable evaluation aspects but do not consider case-specific aspects. On the other hand, evaluation frameworks that are case specific, by eliciting user requirements, limit their output to the evaluation aspects suggested by the users in the early phases of system development. In addition, these case-specific approaches extract different sets of evaluation aspects from each case, making it challenging to collectively compare, unify, or aggregate the evaluation of a set of heterogeneous health information systems.</p>
<div class="newspaper-x-tags"><strong>TAGS: </strong><span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=applied-health-technology" rel="tag">applied health technology</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=biomedical" rel="tag">biomedical</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=bth" rel="tag">BTH</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=ehealth" rel="tag">ehealth</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=evaluation" rel="tag">evaluation</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=fi-star" rel="tag">fi-star</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=fistar" rel="tag">fistar</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=health-information-systems" rel="tag">health information systems</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=mdd" rel="tag">mdd</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=ontologies" rel="tag">ontologies</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=shahryar-eivazzadeh" rel="tag">Shahryar Eivazzadeh</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=technology-assessment" rel="tag">technology assessment</a></span><a href="https://www.designforwellbeing.org/?tag=tobias-larsson" rel="tag">tobias larsson</a> </div>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>